
By
Carol Giacomo, Diplomatic Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Faced with an increasingly hard line from Iran, the
United States and Europe have stepped up planning for tougher diplomatic
action should Tehran follow through on threats to resume critical nuclear
activities, according to U.S. officials and European diplomats.
The U.S. and its European allies are seeking agreement among themselves on
precisely when Iran's nuclear program will have progressed to the point that
the matter should be taken to the U.N. Security Council and what kinds of
sanctions might be pursued there, the officials and diplomats said.
Tehran insists it only aims to produce civilian nuclear energy. Allies say the
program is to produce weapons.
Russia, which is building Iran's nuclear power plant at Bushehr in southern
Iran, remains a serious impediment. The United States fears that weapons grade
plutonium could be extracted from the Bushehr reactor once it goes on line.
The United States and major European nations -- Britain, France and Germany --
have long threatened to bring the issue to the U.N. Security Council for
possible sanctions.
But negotiations appear at an impasse and new Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad has alarmed the world with aggressive calls for Israel to be
"wiped off the map."
"Increasingly, we feel the Iranians are just not interested in any sort
of privately negotiated solution to this problem, that what they are
interested in is a political confrontation over it," one European
diplomat told Reuters.
Under the nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, which Iran signed, member states
are guaranteed the right to develop a full nuclear fuel cycle but are banned
from making weapons.
The Bush administration is under growing pressure from Congress and pro-Israel
groups to soften its stance toward Tehran. They want the nuclear issue
referred to the U.N. Security Council, where sanctions could be imposed.
U.S. Undersecretary of State Robert Joseph, who oversees nonproliferation
issues, was in Europe this week for meetings that included discussions on
Iran.
U.S. and European experts are to meet Iran next week to see if negotiations
can resume, but the outlook is pessimistic.
"I think there are a lot of different pieces moving toward an interesting
point on Iran, especially the nuclear piece," a U.S. official said.
A pro-Israel advocate said administration officials "are considering
harder approaches. Things are moving on a faster track."
A second European diplomat said while there was a U.S. trend to "toughen
the position" on Iran, some Europeans preferred to keeping trying to draw
Russia into a unified position.
Efforts to halt Iran's nuclear program would suffer if the issue was moved to
the Security Council and the council was too divided to take action, some
analysts said.
U.S. officials say if the Security Council discussed Iran's nuclear program,
sanctions would not be imposed immediately, while the council tried other
diplomatic pressures.
WHERE IS THE 'RED LINE'?
Also under discussion is what the United States and other states would
consider their "red line" -- the point at which Iran has crossed
into a dangerous activity that cannot be tolerated.
"We cannot achieve anything until we are certain we see things the same
way," the second European diplomat said.
Iran froze work at its Isfahan nuclear facility in late 2004 under a deal with
Britain, France and Germany but resumed uranium conversion in August 2005.
Tehran has threatened to go further and begin uranium enrichment, the most
sensitive part of the nuclear cycle. The United States, Britain, France and
Germany generally agree any further steps would be unacceptable but Russia is
more lenient, officials said.