Support for Emma Chamberlain

 

To whom it may concern

I am incensed over your deliberate persecution of Emma Chamberlain.  How dare you presume to vilify her or the BNP when we are ruled by a government of treacherous, licentious, corrupt and selfish despots.  There is barely a handful, amongst the entire 600 plus politicians presently in government, who have any integrity at all.  As for local councillors they are, for the main part, an extremely costly joke.  But clearly, from your obsequious toadying to your masters, you are right at home with the people who have sought to reduce our once great country to the failing multicultural mess we now endure and which is firmly annexed to another failing multicultural mess that is the EUSSR. 

For Emma to lose her job, or anyone else victimised for choosing to support the British National Party as the only possible alternative to the present ghastly autocratic, dictatorial and unconstitutional tyrants, is a good indication as to how far we have shifted from democracy.  You have done your part to ensure it shifts a little further.  Your article disgusts me and is an insult to decent journalism and to freedom.  I can guarantee you will not have the courage to print this letter in your paper.  Shame on you.

 Val Manchee

Littlehampton

***************************************************************************

I have been made aware of the unwarranted attack on Ms Emma Chamberlain who is regarded as an `exemplary drama teacher' at the Astor Theatre in Deal.

This woman has committed no crime since the BNP is a legitimate political party with a currently totally legitimate manifesto of its aims - and whether Ms Chamberlain supports them or not is not part of her job description. 

If you really want to help the existing government turn this country into more of a police state then contunuing to attack those citizens who are independently minded enough to think for themselves - whether your organisation agrees with their opinions of not - is a good way to go about it.    

Under the HRA act Ms Chamberlain is guaranteed freedom of belief without fear.    

You have breached that by attacking her for her beliefs.   Be proud     

Yours sincerely 

Rex Caddick

Birmingham
 

***************************************************************************

 

I have known for some time about Miss Chamberlains exposure on the BNP website. Who cares? The vast majority of Britons don't. It seems as if anyone who has nationalist politics must now pay the price for this Blair form of communism this country faces. Why should a British patriot be castergated in such a manner? Falling Newpaper sales are directly attributed to the largely anti British stance that Editors now place on their reporters. Why should every little peice of writing now be "Inclusive"? I, like the vast majority of Britons could not give a flying fig about being Inclusive to any minority. This still remains Briton, England, and whilst we have people like Miss Chamberlain in our country prepaired to work hard teaching and also practice her own politics, as our own Magna carter dictates, then we shall always have an England.

Good for Miss Chamberlain, thank God we still have people with backbone in our country.

Yours sincerely

Andrew McBride...........

 

 ***************************************************************************

 

Emma Chamberlain and the Astor Theatre: How Dissidents are Treated in Modern England by Sean Gabb
 

I was astonished to read the report by Sean Gabb and to read the response of the local MP, an obvious fascist who believes that people must believe as he does or be discriminated against for holding an alternative opinion. To quote the story, it says that Gwyn Prosser, the local Member of Parliament, avoids all pretence of hypocrisy. He insists she should be dismissed for her opinions. He says: "I look upon the BNP as an evil, right-wing, fascist organisation. Anyone that espouses the beliefs of that party should not have anything to do with young people. If my child were in that class [taught by Miss Chamberlain], I would take them out immediately." Now, this is an interesting story. 

I presume that he would apply the same level of discrimination to Hindu's, Buddists, Muslims or Sikhs, or perhap to those with no religious or political views, or those who are black, or Chinese? I wonder how it is that a political organisation that is legally recognised, can be the basis of dismissing an employee of a public facility purely because of association? Perhaps Mt Prosser should be dismissed for belonging to a political party that is recognised by the State and in law, I wonder how the grinning Mr Prosser feels about that, I am sure he has a perfectly slimey explaination to offer, in so far as those we are used to from small minded provincial politicos who see only an opportunity for 5 minutes of media attention on an otherwise boring and uneventful career in party politics and toeing the line as a hanger on, hoping for some form of personal glory. 

Firstly Mr Prosser, until a party is made illegal, employment law must be on the side of the employee who is allowed to associate with legally recognised political organisations, and provided that the individual has not broken any laws, then the "Prosser effect" cannot be invoked without serious consequences. Whether you like the BNP or not is irrelevant, they remain a legal entity and discrimination on the basis of political affiliation is as bad as discrimination because of the color of anyones skin. What next, will the "Prosser Politics Police" ban people from doing jobs unless they register as belonging to approved political organisations only? 

Gwyn Prosser looks like the idiot he clearly is, a man on a mission, to use the clout of his own political organisation to stamp on the employee of a small provincial theatre company and all because he does not like her politics? grow up you moron and get a life, obviously Westminster does not take you seriously if this is the best you can come up with, an ineffectual provincial nobody worth nothing to anyone. 

I wonder if you have the guts to print this response because people are fed up with these snivveling little nobodys from Westminster who shit their incontinence pants every time they find something they don't like, what ever happened to politicans who could conduct themselves with intelligent debate, obviously not present in Dover are they. 

svmconsult

 

 ***************************************************************************

 

Your libellous article concerning Miss Chamberlain: 

Among other things your article read: 

"...things in which the BNP believes - these ranging from deportation of illegal immigrants to resisting the Islamisation of Britain."
 

What is wrong with this? Only by carrying out these actions can Britain be saved from becoming a Muslim caliphate. This is followed by the blatant lies of Gwyn Prosser, the local Member of Parliament: 

"I look upon the BNP as an evil, right-wing, fascist organisation." 

The BNP is not fascist, nor is it evil. The only fascist organization is the labour party which totally ignored the wishes of millions and invaded Iraq, and which has carried out fascist thuggery against the hunt protestors and the BNP activists among others. 

If Miss Chamberlain is dismissed this will merely prove one more fascist action of the police state dictatorship that masquerades as labour democracy.
 

(Name and address supplied on request)

 

***************************************************************************

 

I understand you are proposing the above person be dismissed from her job as a drama teacher  because she is a member of a particular  political party, albeit a legitimate one. I am sure the BNP welcome your proposals  as each time democracy and englishness are attacked, their popularity grows. People such as myself are watching with a mixture of  apprehension and disgust at the behaviour of persons such as yourselves seemingly so intent  on silencing any voices of reason. It is a shame you cannot do it by logical argument , so I assume you have thrown that sponge in without any attempt at combatting what others say, so devoid you must be of argument. In effect you are telling us you have no answers to the BNP's  policies and must therefore attempt to stifle them. In the process you will give the BNP yet more  publicity and no  doubt, more supporters. Or in effect is that your secret mission?

name and address supplied


 

Back To Homepage