World opinion can be summed up in two words, cowardice and appeasement. If world opinion had any moral backbone it would, in an instant, confront the cause of almost ALL the worlds troubles, ISLAM.  I truly believe that if it was not for the world's most powerful tool, the internet, we westerners would be wholly oblivious to the evils of Islam and its alleged prophet.  In many circumstances we are and are shaped by what we are taught.  Nazi Germany is the best example of that.  Hitler at his Nuremberg rallies used to project his national socialist beliefs to the Hitler youth; he made an absolute point of that. Children, who on a regular scale were indoctrinated to national socialist ideas, heard and observed nothing else and, as young adults in the late 30's, became Hitler's tool for war and genocide.  So it is with Islam: youngsters indoctrinated with hatred, murder, oppression.  Islam, a death cult founded by a mass murderer, who commanded deaths and watched as men women and children were raped and murdered.  And guess what?  Not one public figure, NOT ONE, has the guts to stand up and say, HEY, Mohammed was not a prophet, he was a deeply flawed man, who in the 21st century would be hunted down as Bin Laden is.  It is not the fact that so many worship Mohammed which is the problem.  I, today, could in an instant go to a nursery school, or better still, a psychiatric ward, and begin to instil in the minds of the impressionable that Mohammed was a prophet and instil the rest of the nonsense that surrounds him, right to kill, oppress women, enslave, that is EASY. It is the 'world opinion', the deafening cowardly silence that surrounds the very mention of his name and condemnation of his deeds by western society. The 'emperors clothes" philosophy of believing what is not true and ignoring what is true.  I am a catholic, Blair wants to become one too.  I asked a priest 5 years ago, how HE with his beliefs of a divine being who preached peace, love, forgiveness, etc., could possibly empathise with another religion which conflicts with his beliefs so much. How he can possibly condone the beliefs of people who worship a warmonger, rapist, killer. How as a priest he could not speak out against a religion which has such harsh punishments for theft, adultery, oppression of women, public slayings, a religion which hates followers of another religion so much (Jews). A religion which promotes violence and hatred.  Why does he, as a priest not have the GUTS to stand up and say, it, ISLAM is incompatible with all he believes in, and Mohammed should be denounced, just as Hitler was?  Guess what?  He looked at me with utter contempt, that I had challenged his comfortable trouble free way of life, and I KNEW exactly what he was going to say: 'Islam is a religion of peace, followed my millions of peaceful people; it is only a few fundamentalists which follow violence.  I stated that is not what I asked.  I asked, no, I pushed him about the life of Mohammed.  I asked did he as a man of the cloth think GOD had sent Mohammed down to lay the foundation of Islam?  I asked the priest, does he believe that those who kill are rewarded in Paradise?  Still waiting for an answer, but I could cut the contempt, the sheer and utter disdain he felt for my invasion into his rose-coloured non confrontational, wholly deniably utopian world.  World opinion?  Millions die because of world opinion, Dafur is the best example.  'Arab militia', the World too cowardly to say Muslims, killing, raping thousands.  I see it in South Africa, the once jewel of the Southern Hemisphere, now, a county wracked with civil disorder, highest rape, highest murder rate, highest muggings/ assault, highest car-jackings in the world, the most AIDs ridden country in the world, economy and infrastructure in ruins, and a country where a minority population is being murdered and driven from their lands and homes (whites).  Who knows perhaps Mandela will become the next prophet, well after all he was once A MURDERING TERRORIST!!!

As you also know, I truly believe that because of the leadership we now have the misfortune to endure, a leadership totally bereft of backbone, integrity, courage and moral fibre, a leadership which has surrendered in the face of an enemy, the prospect of a right wing military led intervention must be considered, I welcome it. Never has a country been ruled by so many cowards. 

If that prospect shocks you consider Herman Goering's reply to the hapless Robert H Jackson when being cross examined at Nuremberg (this reply, not surprisingly was omitted from the recent docu/drama.) Goering said, when questioned about Nazi political domination of Germany: 

"I consider the Leadership Principle necessary because the system which previously existed, and which we called parliamentary or democratic, had brought Germany to the verge of ruin. I might perhaps in this connection remind you that your own President Roosevelt, as far as I can recall, (I do not want to quote it word for word) declared, "Certain peoples in Europe have forsaken democracy, not because they did not wish for democracy as such, but because democracy had brought forth men who were too weak to give their people work and bread, and to satisfy them. For this reason the peoples have abandoned this system and the men belonging to it."   There is much truth in that statement. This system had brought ruin by mismanagement and according to my own opinion, only an organisation made up of a strong, clearly defined leadership hierarchy could restore order again.  But, let it be understood, not against the will of the people, having in the course of time, and by means of a series of elections, grown stronger and stronger, had expressed their wish to entrust their destiny to the National Socialist Leadership."