
Baghdad Broadcasting Corporation

BBC elephant dance worse than Channel 4
We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News,
| BBC 'too white' | BBC Treachery | BBC Bias |
| Biased BBC | The Dishonest Reporter 'Award' 2005 | EURSOC: Defender Of The Faith |
Robert Henderson writes:
This
is precisely what the BBC should not be about: social engineering and
political propagandising. If the BBC Charter conditions on political
impartiality were enforced it could not happen.
This is a particularly blatant piece of media bias, but it is not out of
step with the general approach of the media in general and the BBC in
particular.
The BBC routinely biases political and current affairs programming by (1)
the choice of programming, including position and prominence of issues, (2)
the choice of presenters and (3) the choice of guests. In
addition, they regularly run phone or text polls which make the news rather
than reporting it. They are also directly collusive with politicians
in suppressing political stories such as the Blair daughter's
attempted suicide.
The BBC is displaying a truly stupid arrogance by being so
openly and unambiguously biased. It gives their enemies - those who
would abolish or re-engineer the BBC out of all recognition - heavy
ammunition to fire when they gain power. RH
********************************************************
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Europe launches Galileo satellite
The BBC have produced another drama, entitled, 'English Harem'. It's another slap in the face for it's MAJORITY viewers because it is absolute rubbish and designed to show the hard working Muslim supporting three women, whilst integrating fully into English society, and being set upon by nasty white racists. Pathetic tripe.
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Europe launches Galileo satellite
Letter to the BBC
"We
are aiming to provide one-metre, worldwide accuracy through
Galileo's 'open'
service - this is not possible today without regional or local
augmentation," said Esa's Galileo project manager, Javier Benedicto.
This is at best disingenuous, at worst an outright lie. GPS has offered
millimetric accuracy for some considerable time (years), albeit with
specialist receiving equipment. Galileo would not offer significantly more.
The project will cost hundreds of billions, to replace a perfectly
acceptable
system with, um, a very similar one.
So what's the difference? In fact, Galileo is no more than an EU control
mechanism, intended to be used for people tracking, and to give the new EU
military independence from GPS. Why would it possibly need that? The only
logical answer is quite ominous: the EU only needs independence from GPS if it
expects to be in conflict with the USA!
I don't expect you to take my arguments at face value (why should you?), but
then why do you accept the spin put on Galileo by the EU and its lackeys, the
British government? Technology providers are hardly impartial either! Why are
you people always acting as apologists for the EU? Yet again we get a
sycophantic story, without any attempt at objectivity.
Shame on you BBC! Your journalists once went on strike to defend the
corporation's objectivity regarding spy satellites (Zircon--you youngsters: go
read some history!), now you roll over to have your tummies tickled on an
issue far more sinister!
Why don't you run a real exposé for a change?
I'm not impressed.
Regards,
Simon Muir.
******************************************************************
Wake
up and smell the coffee through New Labour,
New Socialism,
New Tory with Aesopian Language and the support of Common Purpose, Fabianism,
Davos, Rowntree and their like you now have fully controlling capitalistic New
Communism.
Centralised control and a New Cold War Arms Race with the launch of Galileo an
unwanted, irrelevant rival to Geo Sat. The Central supra national EUropean
soviet is imposing at an eventual cost of Billions.
The hell with the people - where is the similar investment in medical research
to that being spent by YOUR new central EU Government relative to Galileo,
arms production and the air race for power.
Between 1 in 2 and 1 in 3 people in Europe will develop cancer - which do YOU
want your money spent on? Arms, Galileo, Aironautic control or on a cure for
the condition that will PROBABLY kill you?
OK so is the EU a Democracy or just a centralised New Communist power
structure to control YOU.
Galileo will be able to watch YOU as can Geo Sat but the EU wants its own as
America has beliefs in Freedom in its Constitution that prevent its use on
individuals - Yesterday Russia launched upgrade satellites for its own Geo Sat
system. The first blows in the arms race for ultimate power and ultimate
control - where the EU has entered into partnership with China against
America!